<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Review-Loops on Tokenise</title><link>https://tokenise.rosvetic.com/tags/review-loops/</link><description>Recent content in Review-Loops on Tokenise</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 11:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://tokenise.rosvetic.com/tags/review-loops/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>One pull request, fifty review rounds: what Anthropic changed in its AI reviewer</title><link>https://tokenise.rosvetic.com/posts/claude-code-team-review-loop-round-cap/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 11:05:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://tokenise.rosvetic.com/posts/claude-code-team-review-loop-round-cap/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Anthropic&amp;rsquo;s Claude Code team has published an account of how its pull requests get reviewed, and the most useful part isn&amp;rsquo;t the pipeline diagram. It&amp;rsquo;s one number: a single CLI pull request went through more than fifty review rounds overnight before its author stopped it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>